PSA detention requires DM to use independent judgment UPSC

J&K PUBLIC SAFETY ACT

Copyright infringement not intended

Picture Courtesy: https://www.dailyexcelsior.com/5-booked-under-public-safety-act-in-jammu-and-kashmirs-baramulla/

Context: The Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act (PSA) allows the District Magistrate to apply critical thinking when issuing detention orders.

Key Highlights

The Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act (PSA) is legislation that empowers authorities to detain individuals preventively to maintain public order and security of the state. This law allows detention without trial for up to two years based on subjective assessments of potential future threats posed by an individual.

Section 8(1)(a) of PSA

The fundamental of preventive detention under the PSA is Section 8(1)(a), which authorises the government to detain individuals to prevent them from "acting in any manner prejudicial to the security of the State or the maintenance of public order."
This provision allows detention based on apprehensions of future actions that may threaten security or public order, irrespective of any prior criminal activity.

Role of District Magistrate (DM)

Under Section 8(2) of the PSA, the DM has the authority to issue detention orders if they are satisfied that the individual falls under the criteria specified in Section 8(1)(a).
The DM's decision to detain is critical and requires proper application of mind to the circumstances and grounds presented.

Importance of "Application of Mind"

Grounds for Detention: The DM must assess the grounds presented for preventive detention. These grounds should not be a reflection of a police report but must reflect independent consideration and evaluation by the DM.
Disclosure and Representation: Section 13 of the PSA mandates that the DM discloses the grounds of detention to the detainee within a specified period (typically five days). This provision ensures transparency and allows the detainee to make a representation against the detention order.
Consideration of Representation: Upon receiving a representation from the detainee, the DM is obligated to consider it diligently. The representation is not merely a formality but a crucial step in the due process to safeguard individual rights.

Preventive Detention

●Preventive detention refers to the detention or imprisonment of an individual by the state without a formal trial or conviction, based on suspicion that the person may commit a future offence.

●Unlike punitive detention, which is imposed after a person has been found guilty of an offence through due process, preventive detention is a preemptive measure aimed at averting potential threats to public order, national security, or other essential interests.

Legal Framework Under the Indian Constitution

●Article 22 provides specific provisions regarding the rights of arrested or detained persons, distinguishing between ordinary law and preventive detention law. It outlines safeguards applicable to both citizens and aliens detained under preventive laws.

●Preventive detention cannot exceed three months initially unless extended by an advisory board's recommendation.

●The grounds of detention must be communicated to the detained person, although certain information considered against public interest may be withheld.

●The detained person has the right to make a representation against the detention order.

●The Parliament can prescribe circumstances for detention beyond three months without advisory board opinion, maximum detention period, and advisory board procedures.

Rights of Detained Persons

●Right to be informed of the grounds of arrest or detention.

●Right to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner.

●Right to be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours of arrest.

●Right to be released after 24 hours unless the magistrate authorises further detention.

●Preventive detention must be conducted in accordance with established legal procedures and cannot be arbitrary.

Conclusion

The "application of mind" by the District Magistrate is essential in ensuring the legality and validity of preventive detention orders under the Jammu and Kashmir Public Safety Act. This requires independent assessment of detainee representations, and following due process to safeguard individual rights and prevent arbitrary use of preventive detention powers.

Must Read Articles:

4 Years of Removal of Article 370

Article 370

Source:

Indian Express

PRACTICE QUESTION

Q. Consider the following statements in the context of the Preventive detention under the Indian Constitution:

1. Preventive detention allows the government to detain individuals based on apprehensions of future actions that may threaten security or public order.

2. Preventive detention can only be imposed if the individual has already committed a criminal offence.

3. The power of preventive detention is subject to judicial review.

4. The detained person has the right to make a representation against the detention order.

How many of the above statements are correct?

A) Only one

B) Only two

C) Only three

D) All four

Answer: C

Explanation:

Statement 1 is correct: Preventive detention is a measure by which a person is arrested not because they have committed a crime, but to prevent them from committing a crime. It is based on the anticipation of a possible crime that has yet to occur. The government uses this measure to maintain public order and national security.

Statement 2 is incorrect: The very essence of preventive detention is to prevent potential future crimes, not to punish for past crimes. Therefore, it can be imposed even if the individual has not committed any criminal offence.

Statement 3 is correct: The power of preventive detention is subject to judicial review. This means that the courts have the authority to examine the legality of the detention and ensure that it is not being used arbitrarily or unjustly.

Statement 4 is correct: As per Article 22 (5) of the Constitution of India, the detained person has the right to make a representation against the detention order. This means that the detained person can challenge the legality of their detention.