Romania’s bear cull lacks scientific basis, experts argue.

Copyright infringement not intended

Picture Courtesy: https://www.downtoearth.org.in/wildlife-biodiversity/put-a-scientific-lens-to-romanias-bear-cull-decision-not-a-sentimental-one-rashid-naqash

Context: The Romanian parliament approved the culling of 481 brown bears in 2024 to control overpopulation, sparking controversy over the decision's scientific and ecological validity.

Details

The decision by the Romanian parliament to approve the culling of 481 brown bears in 2024 has generated significant controversy and divided opinions. While some argue for a scientific approach to understand the rationale behind the decision, others express concerns about the ethical and conservation implications.

Romanian Brown Bear

●The Romanian Brown Bear plays a crucial role in the ecosystem of the Carpathian Mountains (a range of mountains forming an arc across Central Europe and Southeast Europe.)

●They are considered keystone species, which means their presence and activities have a profound impact on the ecosystem's health and structure. This role is crucial for maintaining the ecological balance of their habitat.

●They contribute to the health of their habitat by controlling prey populations, dispersing seeds, and scavenging. This helps maintain plant diversity and control over other animal populations.

●They are the largest carnivores in Europe, with some individuals reaching up to 7 feet tall and weighing between 100-350 kg. They are adept at climbing trees and can run up to 30 mph.

●They are omnivores with a diet that changes seasonally, including fruits, nuts, insects, and small mammals. Despite being classified as carnivores, their diet is predominantly vegetarian.

●Romania hosts about 60% of Europe's brown bear population, estimated between 4,350 to 6,000 bears. They prefer dense forests with adequate cover for shelter, as well as diverse food sources, including fruit trees and insects.

Background and Rationale

Overpopulation and Human-Wildlife Conflict:
- Romanian politicians argue that the brown bear population has grown excessively, leading to an imbalance where the country’s wilderness areas can no longer support such numbers.
- The decision is reportedly driven by an increase in bear attacks on humans. Over the past 20 years, official figures indicate that 26 people have been killed and 274 severely injured by bears in Romania.
Population Threshold Concept:
- Wildlife experts emphasize the importance of maintaining an ecologically sustainable population of any wild species. The concept of a ‘population threshold’ suggests that when an animal species exceeds a certain number, it loses its ecological role and conservation value.
Human-Bear Interactions:
- In areas where bears interact frequently with human environments, they may start relying on unnatural food sources like garbage, leading to behavioural changes. This phenomenon, called ‘social imprinting,’ results in bears losing their fear of humans and exhibiting behaviours similar to stray animals.

Brown Bear

●Brown bears are sexually dimorphic, with adult males being larger and more robust than females. They are among the largest land carnivores, rivalled only by the polar bear.

●Their fur varies in colour from reddish to yellowish-brown and dark brown to cream.

●They have a prominent muscle hump on their shoulders, which is unique among extant bear species. Their large paws are adapted for digging.

●They are omnivorous and derive about 90% of their diet from plants. They also hunt animals ranging from small rodents to large mammals like moose and muskoxen. Coastal populations in Alaska primarily feed on spawning salmon.

●They can live up to 25 years in the wild.

●Relative to their body size, brown bears have a large brain, which contributes to high cognitive abilities and tool use.

●Despite a reduction in their range and local extinctions, the brown bear is listed as "Least Concern" by the IUCN. However, some populations, such as the Himalayan and Marsican brown bears, are critically endangered.

Ecological and Conservation Considerations

Ecological Role of Brown Bears: Brown bears play a crucial role in their ecosystems, contributing to ecological balance and biodiversity. Culling could disrupt this balance and have unforeseen negative impacts on the environment.
Conservation Status: Romania hosts Europe’s largest brown bear population outside Russia, making it a critical area for the conservation of this species. Conservationists argue that culling may undermine efforts to preserve these bears.

Alternative Methods To Culling
Vaccination	●Disease Control: Vaccination programs can help manage and reduce the spread of diseases in wildlife populations without the need for culling. For instance, vaccination has been successful in controlling rabies in various wildlife species. ●Population Management: In some cases, vaccines can be used to control population growth by inducing fertility suppression.
Fertility Control	●Immunocontraception: This involves using vaccines to induce immune responses that prevent pregnancy. It is a non-lethal method that can help manage population sizes over time. ●Hormonal Treatments: Hormonal contraceptives can be used to control reproduction rates in specific species.
Relocation	●Translocation: Moving animals from overcrowded or problem areas to less populated or more suitable habitats can alleviate pressure on local ecosystems. However, this method needs to be carefully managed to avoid creating new problems in the release areas.
Habitat Management	●Restoration: Improving and restoring natural habitats can provide better resources and reduce the need for animals to move into areas where they might be seen as pests or where conflicts occur. ●Habitat Modification: Altering the environment to make it less attractive or less suitable for certain species can help manage populations.
Exclusion and Deterrence	●Physical Barriers: Fencing and other physical barriers can be used to prevent animals from entering certain areas. ●Repellents: Chemical or auditory repellents can discourage animals from causing problems in specific areas.
Public Education and Engagement	●Awareness Campaigns: Educating the public about wildlife behaviour, prevention strategies, and coexistence can reduce human-wildlife conflicts and promote more sustainable interactions. ●Community Involvement: Engaging local communities in monitoring and managing wildlife can lead to more effective and acceptable solutions.
Ecological Approaches	●Natural Predation: Encouraging or reintroducing natural predators can help control prey populations naturally. ●Ecosystem Management: Maintaining balanced ecosystems can prevent certain species from becoming overabundant and causing problems.
Research and Monitoring	●Population Monitoring: Regular monitoring of wildlife populations and their health can provide data to inform management decisions and identify potential issues before they require drastic measures. ●Behavioural Studies: Understanding animal behaviour and movement patterns can help in developing more targeted and humane management strategies.
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)	●Comprehensive Approach: IPM integrates multiple strategies, including biological control, habitat management, and chemical methods, to manage pest populations in an environmentally responsible way.
Legal and Policy Measures	●Regulations and Incentives: Implementing regulations and providing incentives for conservation practices can support sustainable wildlife management and reduce the need for culling.

Controversy and Opposition

Criticism from Conservation Groups:
- The Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) - Romania and other conservation groups have criticized the culling decision. They argue that the bear population management in Romania has been chaotic and ineffective over the past 20 years.
- Critics claim that the new law does not address the real issue of problem bears near human settlements but instead targets valuable specimens in their natural habitat, potentially for hunting purposes rather than genuine population control.
Scientific Basis and Ethical Concerns:
- Opponents of the cull argue that decisions should be based on solid scientific research and should specifically target bears exhibiting problematic behaviour. They warn that indiscriminate culling could increase social division and lead to financial penalties from the European Commission for improper wildlife management practices.

Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF)

●The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is a prominent international non-governmental organization dedicated to environmental conservation and reducing human impact on nature.

●It was founded in 1961 and originally known as the World Wildlife Fund, it is now recognized as one of the largest and most influential conservation organizations globally.

●WWF's mission is to "stop the degradation of the planet's natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature."

●The organization focuses on six core areas: food, climate, freshwater, wildlife, forests, and oceans.

●Notable Campaigns:

○Earth Hour: An annual global event encouraging individuals and businesses to turn off non-essential lights for one hour to raise awareness about climate change.

○Debt-for-Nature Swaps: A conservation strategy where national debt is forgiven in exchange for commitments to environmental protection.

●Publications and Reports: The Living Planet Report, published biennially since 1998, assesses the health of the planet through the Living Planet Index and ecological footprint calculations.

Conclusion

The debate over Romania’s bear cull decision highlights the complexity of wildlife management in areas with significant human-wildlife interactions. While the need to ensure human safety and manage wildlife populations is clear, the methods and rationale behind such decisions must be scientifically sound and ethically justifiable. Balancing ecological sustainability with human interests remains a critical challenge in conservation efforts.

Must Read Articles:

MAN-ANIMAL CONFLICT

Source:

DOWN TO EARTH

WWW.MOSSY.EARTH

PRACTICE QUESTION

Q. Discuss the ethical justifications and controversies surrounding the practice of culling to manage wildlife populations. What are the alternative methods to culling, and how effective are they in comparison?

ROMANIA BEAR