Free Courses Sale ends Soon, Get It Now


Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C)

22nd February, 2024

Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C)

Disclaimer: Copyright infringement not intended.

Context

  • The Supreme Court recently stated that courts cannot use Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C) to compel the production of documents or things based on an accused's application during the framing of charges.

Section 91 CrPC:

  • Purpose: Enables courts or police officers to summon individuals for the production of documents or things essential for investigations, inquiries, trials, or legal proceedings.
  • Modes of Issuance: Courts may issue a summons, while officers may issue a written order for the production of documents or things.
  • Alternative Compliance: Individuals can send the requested items instead of appearing in person to comply with the summons or order.
  • Exclusions: Does not cover items listed under Sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act or those in the custody of postal or telegraph authorities.
  • Procedure for Personal Attendance: Requires summon under Sections 61-69 or warrants under Sections 70-81 if personal attendance is necessary.
  • Essential Elements:
    • 'Document or Other Thing': Refers to physical material, excluding abstract items like specimen signatures.
    • Desirability: Documents must be necessary or desirable for the proceedings.
    • Identity of Possessor: The possessor's name must be known for the application to be entertained.
  • Exceptions: Does not include an accused person in trial, protecting against self-incrimination.
  • Significance:
    • Safeguards evidence from being misplaced, destroyed, or tampered with.
    • Enables thorough review and evaluation of submitted items.
    • Helps find crucial information for the case.
    • Safeguards the rights of all parties involved.
    • Acts as a check on the authority of law enforcement and courts.
  • Privacy Concerns: Post-Puttaswamy, privacy considerations may impact the use of Section 91, particularly regarding unilaterally issued orders by police.
  • Landmark Judgments:
    • Google India (P) Ltd. v. Visaka Industries: Extended powers to include documents controlled by individuals on behalf of target individuals.
    • CBI v. V. Vijay Sai Reddy: Recognized the Investigating Officer's authority to direct document production without High Court authorization.
    • Om Parkash Sharma v. CBI: Acknowledged the provision's authority but stressed its inherent restrictions based on the circumstances.

Conclusion: Section 91 of the CrPC is a powerful provision that needs to balance the need for evidence with individuals' rights, especially concerning self-incrimination and privacy.

PRACTICE QUESTION

Question: Which of the following statements about Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is/are correct?

A. It enables courts or police officers to summon individuals for the production of documents or things essential for investigations, inquiries, trials, or legal proceedings.

B. Courts can issue a summons, while officers can issue a written order for the production of documents or things.

C. It covers items listed under Sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act or those in the custody of postal or telegraph authorities.

D. It requires a summon under Sections 61-69 or warrants under Sections 70-81 if personal attendance is necessary.

Select the correct answer using the codes given below:

A. A, B, and C only

B. A and B only

C. C only

D. All of the above

Answer: B. A and B only

Explanation: A. Correct: Section 91 of the CrPC enables courts or police officers to summon individuals for the production of documents or things essential for investigations, inquiries, trials, or legal proceedings. B. Correct: Courts can issue a summons, while officers can issue a written order for the production of documents or things. C. Incorrect: Section 91 does not cover items listed under Sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act or those in the custody of postal or telegraph authorities. D. Incorrect: Section 91 does not specifically mention the requirement for a summon under Sections 61-69 or warrants under Sections 70-81 if personal attendance is necessary.